找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation; Pedro‘Serna,José-Antonio Seoane Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

[复制链接]
楼主: Lincoln
发表于 2025-3-26 21:36:52 | 显示全部楼层
Philosophical Imperialism? A Critical View of North American Principlist Bioethics,he following question: what authority does the common morality confer to Principlism? Because, if Principlism does not pretend the background of the authority of the common morality, in what way does Principlism contribute to Bioethics?
发表于 2025-3-27 03:24:50 | 显示全部楼层
1567-8008 methodological approaches for clinical decision-making.ContThis book clarifies the meaning of the most important and pervasive concepts and tools in bioethical argumentation (principles, values, dignity, rights, duties, deliberation, prudence) and assesses the methodological suitability of the main
发表于 2025-3-27 05:45:46 | 显示全部楼层
Versicherung und Risikoforschungm, international bioethics committees are particularly relevant due to the huge impact of their work on global public opinion, as well as on the policies approved by governments all around the world. These bodies are presumed to adopt their decisions, as well as the other bioethics committees, after deliberating on facts and values (Gracia 2001).
发表于 2025-3-27 09:57:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 16:19:06 | 显示全部楼层
Versicherung und Risikoforschungralities such as those found in professional medical ethics, and the circumstances under which particular moralities are consistent with universal morality. Finally, I show the relevance of principles for global research ethics and for an understanding of the rights of minorities in multicultural societies.
发表于 2025-3-27 17:54:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 23:34:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 05:10:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 07:28:21 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9202-0structure and main features of the deliberative method for clinical decision-making and suggests some improvements in its structure, foundations and implementation making use of some contributions of the theories of argumentation.
发表于 2025-3-28 14:27:43 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-7 14:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表