找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation; Pedro‘Serna,José-Antonio Seoane Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

[复制链接]
查看: 25766|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 20:04:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation
影响因子2023Pedro‘Serna,José-Antonio Seoane
视频video
发行地址The only book dealing with the unavoidable link between bioethics and legal argumentation.Accurately describes and sharply assesses the main methodological approaches for clinical decision-making.Cont
学科分类International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
图书封面Titlebook: Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation;  Pedro‘Serna,José-Antonio Seoane Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u
影响因子This book clarifies the meaning of the most important and pervasive concepts and tools in bioethical argumentation (principles, values, dignity, rights, duties, deliberation, prudence) and assesses the methodological suitability of the main methods for clinical decision-making and argumentation. The first part of the book is devoted to the most developed or promising approaches regarding bioethical argumentation, namely those based on principles, values and human rights. The authors then continue to deal with the contributions and shortcomings of these approaches and suggest further developments by means of substantive and procedural elements and concepts from practical philosophy, normative systems theory, theory of action, human rights and legal argumentation. Furthermore, new models of biomedical and health care decision-making, which overcome the aforementioned criticism and stress the relevance of the argumentative responsibility, are included.
Pindex Book 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation网络公开度




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation被引频次




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation年度引用




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation读者反馈




书目名称Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:45:59 | 显示全部楼层
Values and Bioethics,projects and make sound, reasonable, responsible and prudent decisions. And because all human projects include three aspects, the cognitive, the emotional and the operational or practical, deliberation will also proceed in three steps. First of all we must discuss the facts, reducing uncertainty in
发表于 2025-3-22 01:38:19 | 显示全部楼层
A Human Rights Approach to Bioethics,erged from the same dramatic events: the Second World War, the Holocaust, and the Nuremberg trials. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948, which would become the cornerstone of the international human rights law, was to a significant extent informed by the horror caused by the rev
发表于 2025-3-22 08:37:29 | 显示全部楼层
Philosophical Imperialism? A Critical View of North American Principlist Bioethics,ctice of biomedical Ethics resulting from the determination of four basic moral principles that are part of the common morality, understood, in its turn, as a set of universally shared moral beliefs. In spite of the appeal of the proposal, some objections can be made. This paper seeks to introduce t
发表于 2025-3-22 12:12:37 | 显示全部楼层
Principlism and Normative Systems,emporary Bioethics. The aim of this chapter is to assess it under the perspective of normative systems. Regardless its important achievements, the main difficulties that have been identified are the following. First, it does not succeed to justify the normativity of the model, considering the histor
发表于 2025-3-22 16:52:01 | 显示全部楼层
Types of Action and Criteria for Individualizing Them: The Case of Omission of Life-Saving Care,is a necessary condition for both the efficiency of their guiding function and the objectivity of their judging function. To support this thesis, we will first analyze the cognitive and semantic assumptions entailed in both the claim that the abstract types of actions are distinguishable, and the cl
发表于 2025-3-22 19:34:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:04:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:29:00 | 显示全部楼层
International Bioethics Committees: Conditions for a Good Deliberation, depending upon the entity that creates them, their regional scope, the issues they deal with, the ruling strength of their agreements, etc. Among them, international bioethics committees are particularly relevant due to the huge impact of their work on global public opinion, as well as on the polic
发表于 2025-3-23 07:34:51 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-7 14:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表