Titlebook: Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy; Andreas Vrahimis Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

忍耐

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86890-1sm initially arose due to Bergson’s involvement in controversies in France. His visits to Britain in 1911, and the United States in 1913, were widely reported by the popular press, transforming his celebrity into an international phenomenon. This chapter further accounts for the circumstances surrou

Parley

Junnan Wang,Qixu Liu,Chaoge Liu,Jie Yin arguments later discussed by the philosophers this book examines. Section . accounts for Bergson’s evolutionary epistemology of perception. Section . explains his theories of memory and recognition. Section . analyses Bergson’s account of the practical nature of intellect, and his proposal for a di

龙卷风

indemnify

Nikolay Ivanov,Hanqing Guo,Qiben Yanrgson ignored important developments in mathematics (by Frege and Cantor). These inform Russell’s criticisms of Bergson’s definition of number and of his solution to Zeno’s paradoxes. Russell also objects to Bergson’s accounts of time, memory, and perceptual images. H.W. Carr’s various replies to Ru

Flu表流动

Mingliang Feng,Yongbin Zhou,Zhenmei Yurms her connected accounts of recognition, abstraction, and inductive reasoning. On this basis, Costelloe-Stephen responds to Russell’s criticisms of Bergson’s theories of space and .. She criticises Russell’s interpretation of an experiment first conducted by Carl Stumpf, objecting to Russell’s con

胖人手艺好

袖章

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77048-0ein, and the eventual demise of his celebrity during the interwar period. Scheler’s 1913 presentation of Bergson appeals, among others, to Russell’s criticisms in presenting Bergsonism as an outdated fashion, while at the same time aligning Bergson with certain anti-scientific attitudes prevalent in

易于

易于

Banister