找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Bayesian Argumentation; The practical side o Frank Zenker Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Ad Hominem Argument Baye

[复制链接]
楼主: 航天飞机
发表于 2025-3-25 06:59:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:11:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 13:28:28 | 显示全部楼层
0166-6991 l life court cases, results of experimental research, and in.Relevant to, and drawing from, a range of disciplines, the chapters in this collection show the diversity, and applicability, of research in Bayesian argumentation. Together, they form a challenge to philosophers versed in both the use and
发表于 2025-3-25 16:20:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 22:07:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:08:12 | 显示全部楼层
A Survey of Uncertainties and Their Consequences in Probabilistic Legal Argumentationalistic example. After introducing the Carneades argument model and its probabilistic semantics, we propose an extension to the Carneades Bayesian Network model to support probability distributions over argument weights, a feature we believe is desirable. Finally, we scout possible future approaches to facilitate reasoning with argument weights.
发表于 2025-3-26 06:50:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 10:42:06 | 显示全部楼层
Human Brain and Artificial IntelligenceThe main aim of this chapter is to investigate which assumptions of the standard theory we have to give up to account for our communicative behavior, when preferences between partners are not aligned.
发表于 2025-3-26 13:43:42 | 显示全部楼层
Ziyu Zhao,Hui Shen,Dewen Hu,Kerang Zhangmposes a deductive relation. I argue for the second class, as the first class is problematic if the arguments involve conditionals. I present a measure of argument strength that allows for dealing explicitly with uncertain conditionals in the premise set.
发表于 2025-3-26 17:39:50 | 显示全部楼层
Masumi Inaba M.D.,Yoshikata Inaba M.D., Cambridge, 2008). This chapter treats this issue from the perspective of the Bayesian approach to argument (Hahn & Oaksford, Psychol Rev 114:704–732, 2007a; Hahn et al., Informal Log 29:337–367, 2009) and summarises empirical evidence on key intuitions.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 10:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表