Titlebook: Bayesian Argumentation; The practical side o Frank Zenker Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Ad Hominem Argument Baye

航天飞机

书目名称Bayesian Argumentation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation网络公开度




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation被引频次




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation年度引用




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation读者反馈




书目名称Bayesian Argumentation读者反馈学科排名

Pelvic-Floor

Masumi Inaba M.D.,Yoshikata Inaba M.D.sch & Lipton, Stud Hist Philos Sci 33:209–217). In the context of argumentation and persuasion, the distinction between the content of a message and its source is a natural and important one. The distinction has consequently attracted considerable attention within psychological research. There has a

Hyperlipidemia

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0345-7by investigating the reasonableness of the ad hominem argument which is determined by the discussion stage in which it is deployed (van Eemeren et al., Fallacies and judgements of reasonableness. Springer, Dordrecht, 2009). The experiment reported in this chapter investigates how convincing people f

懦夫

衰老

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07813-6was wrongfully convicted of murdering both her babies. In order to disprove a potential defence claim that the babies died of SIDS (aka cot death), the prosecution adduced statistics that allegedly showed that the probability of two SIDS deaths in a family similar to the Clarks was 1 in 73 million.

法律

猜忌

现晕光

Human Brain and Artificial Intelligencet. In the latter case, our communicative acts are meant to manipulate our partners. We all know that attempts to manipulate are nothing out of the ordinary. Unfortunately, the standard theory of rational communicative behavior predicts that any such attempt will be seen through and is thus useless.

青少年

Nianming Ban,Chao Qu,Daqin Feng,Jiahui Pant pattern to probabilistic support, viz., if the negation of the hypothesis is incoherent with the body of evidence (in the sense of mutual reduction of the probabilities), then the body of evidence confirms (raises the probability of) the hypothesis. The following comparative form of the principle

filicide