找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Basic Income Reconsidered; Social Justice, Libe Simon Birnbaum Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2012 politic

[复制链接]
楼主: 调停
发表于 2025-3-25 04:05:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:46:27 | 显示全部楼层
2662-3803 Overview: Basic income is one the most innovative, powerful and controversial proposals for addressing poverty and growing inequalities. This book examines the arguments for and against basic income from the point of view of economic and social justice.978-1-349-29562-3978-1-137-01542-6Series ISSN 2662-3803 Series E-ISSN 2662-3811
发表于 2025-3-25 13:00:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 16:40:06 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53795-0 one accepts certain liberal-egalitarian starting points associated with the Rawlsian project. An unconditional set of universal social rights can be justified as a way of supporting a brute-luck-countering (maximin-guided, i.e., efficiency-sensitive) equalization of the freedom to do whatever one might want to do.
发表于 2025-3-25 20:43:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:43:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 04:32:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 08:40:36 | 显示全部楼层
Periodization of the Hepu Han Tombs,-egalitarian demands discussed in chapter 2. Philippe Van Parijs’s way of arriving at his radical conclusion that justice requires “the highest sustainable” basic income rests heavily on one interesting and controversial argument, namely, that the so-called employment rents, accessed through favorab
发表于 2025-3-26 13:27:08 | 显示全部楼层
Zwischen Sprache und Information II,ngness to work, may be superior to the work-tested minimum income programs of traditional welfare states. As discussed in the last two chapters, Philippe Van Parijs’s powerful neutrality-based justification of basic income argues that a universal arrangement of that kind serves to equalize access to
发表于 2025-3-26 19:22:32 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53795-0 one accepts certain liberal-egalitarian starting points associated with the Rawlsian project. An unconditional set of universal social rights can be justified as a way of supporting a brute-luck-countering (maximin-guided, i.e., efficiency-sensitive) equalization of the freedom to do whatever one m
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-19 21:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表