找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Axel Honneth and the Critical Theory of Recognition; Volker Schmitz Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 recogni

[复制链接]
楼主: GERD847
发表于 2025-3-23 10:50:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:03:47 | 显示全部楼层
Toward a Three-Dimensional User Interfaceetical framework inherited by Habermas, suggesting that the “emancipatory intent” of the Frankfurt School and its current methodological paradigm(s) are difficult to reconcile and highlight the importance of the individual theorist’s pre-scientific commitment.
发表于 2025-3-23 19:42:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:56:51 | 显示全部楼层
Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Radical Reformism,etical framework inherited by Habermas, suggesting that the “emancipatory intent” of the Frankfurt School and its current methodological paradigm(s) are difficult to reconcile and highlight the importance of the individual theorist’s pre-scientific commitment.
发表于 2025-3-24 04:59:06 | 显示全部楼层
The Failure of the Recognition Paradigm in Critical Theory,ce it to its intersubjective practices. The problem with the pragmatist thesis, however, is that it is both insensitive to issues of power and domination and also can inculcate conformity to the prevailing reality. By shutting Marx out of his revisionism of critical theory, Honneth therefore ends up defanging it as a system of ideas.
发表于 2025-3-24 06:44:26 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2019s, it has been characterized primarily by Jürgen Habermas’s “communicative turn” and a focus on normative foundations. Today, that “second generation” exists side-by-side with a “third generation” represented most prominently by Axel Honneth’s turn toward recognition, ethical life, and the normative
发表于 2025-3-24 12:45:05 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4116-4authors analyze the current direction of critical theory, contextualize it both intellectually and politically, and develop their own visions and suggestions of “what is to be done” in order to maintain critical theory’s scholarly and “emancipatory intent.”
发表于 2025-3-24 18:26:16 | 显示全部楼层
,Geometric Basis of Human–Like Biomechanics, elementary recognition would seem to be largely unrelated. But as this paper will show, the two works discuss very similar ideas and complement each other quite well. Furthermore, the expansion of some ideas developed in Honneth’s study of the . can help respond to criticisms that have been leveled against his theory of elementary recognition.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:01:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 02:46:58 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 03:11
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表