Titlebook: A Pragmatic Approach to Conceptualization of Health and Disease; Maartje Schermer,Nicholas Binney Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if appl

阻塞

Addiction and Its Ambiguities: Some Comments from History,ted for at least several centuries. Is addiction a sin, an individual weakness, or a brain disease? Is it caused by the substance, by the individual’s vulnerability and psychology, or by social factors? As historians have demonstrated, ideas about addiction have changed significantly over time (Acke

Pert敏捷

,Pragmatism in the Fray: Constructing Futures for ‘Medically Unexplained Symptoms’,ly defined disease. It is discursively related to several other concepts including ., . (DSM 5), and ., which include the diagnoses of fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple chemical sensitivity, and irritable bowel syndrome, among others. Some of these conditions are currently the object

健谈的人

anthesis

Conceptual Engineering Health: A Historical-Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of Positive Healtg and contextualizing concepts, which implies adapting, improving or replacing them. This new view on pragmatically formulating definitions for health and disease concepts lines up with what has recently come to be known as .. In this paper we analyze and evaluate the concept of Positive Health by a

尽忠

袭击

RENIN

cancellous-bone

担心

,Die kaufmännische Perspektive,and relative to a ‘spectrum of relativistic positions’ that I outline. The main upshot of the paper is do identify the main differences and commonalities of the three varieties of ‘historiographical medical relativism’. I defend the authors only insofar as I show that they are not per se committed to “equal-validity relativism”.

发微光

Grundfragen der Medienwirtschaftads. Historiographical relativists despise the claim that a settlement was always built on the same foundation. This raises a couple of questions: Who are these people? What are their reasons? What is more basically their general motivation? And how convincing are both—their reasons and their motivations?