Titlebook: Authoritarian Populism and Liberal Democracy; Ivor Crewe,David Sanders Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

先行

Does Populism Discredit Direct Democracy?the normal functioning of democracies which they can well cope with. The fourth section discusses how representative processes and direct policy voting could complement each other in the future, with political parties as the key link—particularly in terms of framing and firming up inchoate popular preferences.

exceed

How Should Established Parties Respond to the Rise of Identity Politics in Their Electoral Base?eviews the potentially transformative importance of social media as a reflection/generator of new forms of identity politics, particularly around sexual identity. He argues that the destructive impact of identity politics on US Democrats is not yet easily transferable to the UK, though the potential is there.

Angiogenesis

CYT

Flustered

时间等

Valeriy G. Bardakov,Mikhail V. Neshchadimion. The chapter further outlines the three main sections of the book: the first analysing populist movements across a number of advanced liberal democracies; the second addressing how liberal democracies should respond to the authoritarian populist challenge; and the third reviewing Anthony King’s contribution to the study of liberal democracy.

跳动

Modular representations of reductive groups,The author looks at how political parties, secular education and women’s rights have helped Tunisia in its transition to democracy, and in turn, can help us to better advance our understanding of how democracy can take hold in the region.

gain631

Group Process Oriented Interventions,ulism. In many discussions of populism the ‘problem’ is assumed to lie in the attitudes and behaviour of ordinary citizens. This chapter argues that the problem lies not with these ordinary citizens but with the elites who have destroyed the postwar settlement and are now living with the consequences.

我说不重要

突变

Practical Applications of Choice Methods,ist reaction against the Westminster political class which has surfaced in this decade, leading to the vote for Brexit in June 2016. The author concludes that leaving the EU will trigger profound and unpredictable political and constitutional changes well beyond what was considered desirable or feasible two decades ago.