| 期刊全称 | Argumentation in Science Education | | 期刊简称 | Perspectives from Cl | | 影响因子2023 | Sibel Erduran,María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre | | 视频video | | | 发行地址 | The first book on argumentation in science education.Interest of researchers in argumentation is increasing, as evidenced by number of papers in journals and conferences, and by doctoral dissertations | | 学科分类 | Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education | | 图书封面 |  | | 影响因子 | Our conversations about arguments began in Nashville in the Spring of 1996 in Richard Duschl’s doctoral seminar that we were both attending, Marilar Jiménez-Aleixandre as a visiting scholar at Vanderbilt University. Jiménez-Aleixandre and Duschl were designing authentic problems in genetics for the University of Santiago de Compostela-based RODA project aimed at engaging high school students in argumentation. Erduran and Duschl had been working on Project SEPIA extending their work in Pittsburgh schools to the design of curricula that support epistemological aspects of scientific inquiry including argumentation. In that spring we attended a NARST s- sion in St Louis, where Gregory Kelly, Steven Druker and Catherine Chen presented a paper about argumentation. As a consequence, a symposium about argumentation was organised (possibly the first of its kind) at the 1997 NARST meeting in Chicago, including papers from Kelly and colleagues and from Jiménez-Aleixandre, Bugallo and Duschl. The symposium was attended, among others, by Rosalind Driver, who had just submitted an application for funding of an argumentation project based at King’s College London, a project Erduran would incident | | Pindex | Book 2007 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 18:12:06
