Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 4th International Wo Iyad Rahwan,Simon Parsons,Chris Reed Conference proceedings 2008 Springer-Verlag

娘娘腔

使苦恼

Mercurial

A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part I)yncretic direction such as the interplay between neural net argumentation and symbolic argumentation. More specifically, we address ourselves to the following basic questions that can not be overlooked..Consequently, we give the positive answers to them. They are beneficial for understanding or char

Aerophagia

A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II)yncretic direction such as the interplay between neural net argumentation and symbolic argumentation. This paper is a sequel to our former one (Part I) [1]. In this paper we address ourselves to the following basic questions that can not be overlooked. .Consequently, we give the positive answers to

核心

Episodic Memory: Effortful Phenomena,gumentation within the A&A meta-model, we introduce here the notion of Co-Argumentation Artifact (CAA) as an artifact specialised in managing arguments and providing a coordination service for argumentation process in a MAS. In order to give concreteness to our proposal, we also discuss a first CAA

除草剂

抱狗不敢前

Experimental Psychopharmacology,ues between agents. We also propose a declarative specification of these communicative concepts that is of sufficient generality to serve as an operational semantics. Specifically, we propose use of the Lightweight Coordination Calculus (LCC). We then illustrate our proposal with a use case multi-ag

Parabola

Fabio Taucer,Roberta Apostolskaes, like for instance classifying examples even when the set of training examples is inconsistent, and considering more general preference relations between hypotheses. Moreover, we show that in the particular case of concept learning, the results of version space theory are retrieved in an elegant

accordance

调味品

A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Informationzation to access some information source. This protocol is based on an argumentation dialog where agents handle specific preferences and acceptability over arguments. We show how this argumentation framework provides a semantics to the protocol dedicated to the exchange of arguments, and we illustra