Titlebook: Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion; Paul O’Grady Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 god.philosoph

复杂

书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion网络公开度




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion被引频次




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion被引频次学科排名




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion年度引用




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion年度引用学科排名




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion读者反馈




书目名称Aquinas‘s Philosophy of Religion读者反馈学科排名

钝剑

Lineare Algebra und Gleichungssysteme,able as such negative characterizations are, Aquinas holds that they are nevertheless insufficient. He critiques Maimonides’s purely negative approach to God [ST 1.13.2], saying that it is not the case that terms predicated of God only serve to deny things of the divinity. On such an approach there

为现场

Philosophy and Theology,unt as evidence against religious belief?’. Such a discipline faces challenges from several sides. Some contend that human reason has not the resources to adjudicate such questions. Others maintain that scientific inquiry is the only legitimate mode of answering them. Others again argue that only so

蹒跚

,God’s Nature: The Way of Eminence,able as such negative characterizations are, Aquinas holds that they are nevertheless insufficient. He critiques Maimonides’s purely negative approach to God [ST 1.13.2], saying that it is not the case that terms predicated of God only serve to deny things of the divinity. On such an approach there

舰旗

SHOCK

创作

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64251-1 broadest level, I want to look at the general intellectual context of the thirteenth century, discussing the environment in which Aquinas wrote and examining the influences on him. After a brief biographical sketch, I shall then survey his writings, noting their genres and issues about interpretati

小卒

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64251-1aching some of the same truths. His account of how this is so reaches its most mature statement in ST II-II q. 1–7, but it appears in different places in his work. In this chapter I want to examine Aquinas’s views on reason, then his views on faith and finally how he considers their relationship. Bu

急急忙忙

柔声地说

Erste Schritte in die Theoretische Physikce, the kind of dialectic seen in the previous chapter. Secondly, there are arguments which seek to independently show that the existence of such a thing as the God of classical theism is impossible or irrational to believe. Of this latter kind the two most powerful in contemporary discussions are t