| 期刊全称 | Animal Mind — Human Mind | | 期刊简称 | Report of the Dahlem | | 影响因子2023 | D. R. Griffin | | 视频video | | | 学科分类 | Dahlem Workshop Report | | 图书封面 |  | | 影响因子 | the oleic acid on a live and wriggling sister or mother and refrain from evicting her from our hive. But does the occur rence of unintelligent behavior suffice to demonstrate the total absence of mental experience under any circumstances? Ethologists from some distant galaxy could easily discern ex amples of stupid and maladaptive behavior in our own species. But do instances of human stupidity prove that none of us is ever consciously aware of what he is dOing? No available evi dence compels us to believe that insects, or any other animals, experience any sort of consciousness, or intentionally plan any of their behavior. But neither are we compelled to believe the contrary. In areas where data are few and of limited rel evance, dogmatic negativity can easily limit what scientists even try to investigate, and thus perhaps delay or prevent im portant insights and discoveries. Many of the participants agreed that a good starting point would be to consider what we know of our own thinking, subjec tive feelings, and consciousness, and then move on to inquire whether other species experience anything similar. Such an ap proach was once considered fallaciously anthropomorphic. Bu | | Pindex | Conference proceedings 1982 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 17:37:06
