Titlebook: Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition; Paolo Tripodi Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020

COLON

Book 2020such a decline?  ..This book expertly traces the early reception of Wittgenstein in the United States, the shift in the humanities to a tradition rooted in the natural sciences, and the economic crisis of the mid-1970s, to revealthe factors that contributed to the eventual hostility towards the later Wittgensteinian tradition..

Budget

2634-5994 tes the tension between Wittgenstein‘s later humanistic styl.This book aims to explain the decline of the later Wittgensteinian tradition in analytic philosophy during the second half of the twentieth century. Throughout the 1950s, Oxford was the center of analytic philosophy and Wittgenstein – the

ostracize

Book 2020Throughout the 1950s, Oxford was the center of analytic philosophy and Wittgenstein – the later Wittgenstein – the most influential contemporary thinker within that philosophical tradition. Wittgenstein‘s methods and ideas were widely accepted, with everything seeming to point to the Wittgensteinian

rheumatology

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3554-3iversities of Oxford and Cambridge. The main characters of this story were Popper, Watkins and, above all, Ernest Gellner, the author of . (1959). Gellner’s philosophical and sociological critique of Oxford linguistic philosophy was influential: Gellner addressed issues such as the hostility of ling

Traumatic-Grief

Coalgebra, Concurrency, and Control applied to Wittgenstein. However, with very few exceptions, the Wittgensteinians did not provide a commensurate response to Quine. Arguably, they were not fully aware of the historically objective conditions that made Quine’s attack so successful and epoch-making, so as to indirectly weaken the Wit

粗糙滥制

Symbolic Abstractions of Automata and Cavell. In the context of the new rigourism in the humanities, analytic philosophers reacted with hostility. The chapter focuses on three main episodes or groups of episodes: Putnam’s 1962 attack on Malcolm’s grammatical investigation of dreaming; Davidson’s (terminological, rather than substan

countenance

Ganglion

Bereavement

Between