找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition; Paolo Tripodi Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020

[复制链接]
查看: 13941|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 16:49:40 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition
影响因子2023Paolo Tripodi
视频video
发行地址Explains the decline of the later Wittgensteinian tradition in the history of analytic philosophy from the 1950s to the present day.Illuminates the tension between Wittgenstein‘s later humanistic styl
学科分类History of Analytic Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition;  Paolo Tripodi Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020
影响因子.This book aims to explain the decline of the later Wittgensteinian tradition in analytic philosophy during the second half of the twentieth century. Throughout the 1950s, Oxford was the center of analytic philosophy and Wittgenstein – the later Wittgenstein – the most influential contemporary thinker within that philosophical tradition. Wittgenstein‘s methods and ideas were widely accepted, with everything seeming to point to the Wittgensteinian paradigm having a similar impact on the philosophical scenes of all English speaking countries. However, this was not to be the case. By the 1980s, albeit still important, Wittgenstein was considered as a somewhat marginal thinker. What occurred within the history of analytic philosophy to produce such a decline?  ..This book expertly traces the early reception of Wittgenstein in the United States, the shift in the humanities to a tradition rooted in the natural sciences, and the economic crisis of the mid-1970s, to revealthe factors that contributed to the eventual hostility towards the later Wittgensteinian tradition..
Pindex Book 2020
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition网络公开度




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition被引频次




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition被引频次学科排名




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition年度引用




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition年度引用学科排名




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition读者反馈




书目名称Analytic Philosophy and the Later Wittgensteinian Tradition读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:27:30 | 显示全部楼层
Coalgebra, Concurrency, and Controls of Paul Samuelson and his neoclassical colleagues. Discussing some issues taken from Winch’s ., the chapter also describes the later Wittgenstein as a strenuous advocate of the autonomy of humanistic understanding, in the old, non-rigourist and not scientific-oriented sense of the term.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:09:29 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0031-8wever, identity of style doesn’t entail full metaphilosophical and methodological agreement, especially in presence of disagreement in the theory of meaning. Focusing on this issue, the chapter briefly discusses some themes from . (2007) by Timothy Williamson, a student of Dummett and a metaphilosop
发表于 2025-3-22 05:03:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:21:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:19:32 | 显示全部楼层
The Core and the Periphery,-academic style. Second, Gellner taught in London and criticised Oxford, but from a geopolitic, economic, and even philosophic point of view the centre of the world had moved, and Britain had irremediably become more peripheral, with respect to the United States.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:08:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:27:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:11:53 | 显示全部楼层
Symbolic Abstractions of AutomataWittgenstein’s private language argument and the later debate between Chomsky and the Wittgensteinians on knowledge of language). In most, if not all, cases, it clearly emerged that the “dark side” of the later Wittgensteinian tradition was widely identified with its non-scientific nature.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:09:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 02:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表