Titlebook: An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility; Intellectual Norms a Andrea Robitzsch Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Ep

受伤

Foment

心痛

植物群

What Should We Do in the Face of Epistemic Peer Disagreement?,assessment is epistemically significant because it is governed by certain epistemic norms, namely the norms of reliable intellectual conduct. Moreover, I have argued that the performance of belief-influencing actions and omissions which are licensed by the norms of reliable intellectual conduct cond

CALL

Das Gleichungssystem der Plasmadynamik, doxastic control. There are two different kinds of direct doxastic control to be found in the literature, intentional doxastic control and evaluative doxastic control. Although many epistemologists agree that we do not have intentional doxastic control over our doxastic attitudes, it has been argue

Commemorate

,Die ‚Platte‘ als sozio-technisches System,f intellectual norms we can evaluate whether an agent is blameworthy, praiseworthy or neutrally evaluable for holding a certain doxastic attitude. In the following chapter, I will explain what an . is. I am roughly following Peels’ general idea that . regulate belief-influencing actions (2017, p. 10

HAUNT

Ganglion-Cyst

下船

裤子

,Die ‚Platte‘ als sozio-technisches System,In this chapter I will present an approach to doxastic responsibility that is based on indirect doxastic control.