找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research; Theory Meets Data Elizabeth de Freitas,Margaret Walshaw Book 2016 Sp

[复制链接]
查看: 41168|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 16:41:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research
期刊简称Theory Meets Data
影响因子2023Elizabeth de Freitas,Margaret Walshaw
视频video
发行地址Explains significant theories from the humanities and social sciences and how their application can improve the quality of research in education.Offers context and motivation for particular research m
图书封面Titlebook: Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research; Theory Meets Data Elizabeth de Freitas,Margaret Walshaw Book 2016 Sp
影响因子This book explicates some of the fundamental philosophical tenets underpinning key theoretical frameworks, and demonstrates how these tenets inform particular kinds of research practice in mathematics education research. We believe that a deep understanding of significant theories from the humanities and social sciences is crucial for doing high-quality research in education. For that reason, this book focuses on six key theoretical sources, unpacking their relevance and application to specific research examples.   .We situate these key theorists within a larger framework pertaining to the history of thought more generally, and discuss how competing theories of teaching and learning differ in terms of their philosophical assumptions. In so doing, we offer context and motivation for particular research methods, with the agenda of helping researchers reflect on why particular approaches and not others might work for them..
Pindex Book 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research网络公开度




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research被引频次




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research被引频次学科排名




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research年度引用




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research年度引用学科排名




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research读者反馈




书目名称Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Mathematics Education Research读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:20:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:18:55 | 显示全部楼层
Michel Foucault,eva, Jean-Francois Lyotard and other intellectuals, Foucault can be considered as part of a ‘postmodern sensibility’. He was critical of Aristotle for his essentialism, Descartes for his Cogito, Kant for his humanism, Hegel for his notion of progress and totality and Habermas for his utopianism. Som
发表于 2025-3-22 04:47:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:42:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:06:01 | 显示全部楼层
Bruno Latour,ialism and is a catalyst for new developments in the field of science and technology studies (STS). His work speaks directly to all social science researchers who wish to study activity, interaction and the production of shared knowledge. His work also speaks to those interested in policy, geopoliti
发表于 2025-3-22 18:52:10 | 显示全部楼层
Karen Barad,ewtonian classical physics, in which the laws of nature were thought to be deterministic, Barad prompts us to ask what kinds of new social sciences will emerge today, as part of the shift in scientific paradigm towards the quantum. Barad (., 2007) proposes ‘agential realism’ to help rethink how we m
发表于 2025-3-22 21:15:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:29:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:33:20 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 13:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表