找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend; Recent Issues in The Robert Nola,Howard Sankey Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

[复制链接]
楼主: External-Otitis
发表于 2025-3-23 12:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 17:24:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:59:17 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37152-3 a subject of interest in science and natural philosophy for millennia, their existence and properties remained clouded in debate and clear demonstrations of their existence and properties only emerged in the early part of this century when the same occurred for electrons.
发表于 2025-3-24 00:10:34 | 显示全部楼层
Criminal Profiling and Public Policyparently remarked ‘I cannot condemn a book before reading it; but after reading it, I shall’. My favourite remark, though, from within a book review is probably: ‘This book fills a much-needed gap in the literature.’
发表于 2025-3-24 03:43:47 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-146-2nces. More generally, the discussion will (i) provide a logical analysis of the instrumental significance of empirical meta-methodology and (ii) redefine the role of logic in a post-positivistic, naturalized approach to epistemology and scientific method.
发表于 2025-3-24 09:08:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:28:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 15:36:04 | 显示全部楼层
,Kuhn, Bayes and ‘Theory-Choice’: How Revolutionary is Kuhn’s Account of Theoretical Change?,parently remarked ‘I cannot condemn a book before reading it; but after reading it, I shall’. My favourite remark, though, from within a book review is probably: ‘This book fills a much-needed gap in the literature.’
发表于 2025-3-24 21:32:02 | 显示全部楼层
Naturalism Logicized,nces. More generally, the discussion will (i) provide a logical analysis of the instrumental significance of empirical meta-methodology and (ii) redefine the role of logic in a post-positivistic, naturalized approach to epistemology and scientific method.
发表于 2025-3-25 02:56:23 | 显示全部楼层
1871-7381 n the last decade. Thebook will be of interest to philosophers and scientists alike in thereassessment it provides of earlier debates about method and currentdirections of research.978-1-4020-0246-5978-94-011-3935-9Series ISSN 1871-7381 Series E-ISSN 2215-1958
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 04:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表