找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend; Recent Issues in The Robert Nola,Howard Sankey Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

[复制链接]
查看: 53514|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 17:11:23 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend
期刊简称Recent Issues in The
影响因子2023Robert Nola,Howard Sankey
视频video
学科分类Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
图书封面Titlebook: After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend; Recent Issues in The Robert Nola,Howard Sankey Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000
影响因子Some think that issues to do with scientific method are lastcentury‘s stale debate; Popper was an advocate of methodology, butKuhn, Feyerabend, and others are alleged to have brought the debateabout its status to an end. The papers in this volume show that issuesin methodology are still very much alive. Some of the papersreinvestigate issues in the debate over methodology, while others setout new ways in which the debate has developed in the last decade. Thebook will be of interest to philosophers and scientists alike in thereassessment it provides of earlier debates about method and currentdirections of research.
Pindex Book 2000
The information of publication is updating

书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend影响因子(影响力)




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend网络公开度




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend网络公开度学科排名




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend被引频次




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend被引频次学科排名




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend年度引用




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend年度引用学科排名




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend读者反馈




书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:15:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:26:15 | 显示全部楼层
,Kuhn, Bayes and ‘Theory-Choice’: How Revolutionary is Kuhn’s Account of Theoretical Change?, Smith, who opined ‘I never read a book before reviewing it — it prejudices a man so!’ Another favourite — in similar (though strictly speaking contrary) vein — is from a psychologist friend of Wesley Salmon’s, who, when asked for his opinion of the latest Dianetics tosh by Lafayette Ron Hubbard, ap
发表于 2025-3-22 06:01:35 | 显示全部楼层
With Friends Like These ..., or What is Inductivism and Why is it Off the Agenda?,sive. On one side, indisputably, was Karl Popper. The name he coined for his foes had even by the 1980s no entry in the ., the ., the ., or even that repository of words too unrespectable to make such august lexica, Partridge’s .. He called them “.“.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:42:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:10:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:07:41 | 显示全部楼层
Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science,ve ground for scientific theory appraisal and acceptance. The second task is to explain how application of this methodology leads to advance toward the aim(s) of science. In other words, the goal of the theory of method is to provide an integrated explanation of both rational scientific theory choic
发表于 2025-3-22 22:00:34 | 显示全部楼层
Hard Problems in the Philosophy of Science: Idealisation and Commensurability,ted by Hume’s problem of induction has always kept the issue of scientific truth at the forefront of philosophical research. Philosophers expended great energy in defending a broad spectrum of replies to Hume’s scepticism, ranging from the view that theories are merely instruments for the control an
发表于 2025-3-23 03:39:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:54:31 | 显示全部楼层
Criminal Profiling of Serial Arson Offenses,at energy in defending a broad spectrum of replies to Hume’s scepticism, ranging from the view that theories are merely instruments for the control and prediction of nature, to realist views of science (which hold that science aims at the truth about the world, and is rational in the pursuit of this goal).
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 04:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表