找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method; Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc Cohen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[复制链接]
楼主: 自由
发表于 2025-3-26 22:42:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 02:25:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 05:52:51 | 显示全部楼层
Virtue in Socratic Ignorance: , will ever be entirely satisfactory? The . may provide an answer, for it raises the possibility that the virtue that is the topic of this dialogue, . (self-mastery), may actually turn out to be the limited wisdom that Socrates claims to have, namely, self-knowledge.
发表于 2025-3-27 11:41:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 17:30:35 | 显示全部楼层
Forms Left Unanalyzed: ,not want his readers to think that the elenchus is hopeless as a way to arrive at a satisfactory philosophical analysis, it is notable that the elenchus does not play a role in the elucidation of this theory. This strongly suggests that Plato has come to see that the elenchus alone is insufficient a
发表于 2025-3-27 21:43:34 | 显示全部楼层
,Downgrading the Elenchus: , I–II, I as a standard elenchus. Rather, Plato wants to show that the classic elenchus depends on assumptions that will not always be met. And in . II, he makes it clear that the classic elenchus will be powerless against a well-worked out philosophical theory offered by a sophisticated professional. What
发表于 2025-3-28 00:47:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 02:24:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 10:10:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 11:27:45 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 02:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表