找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method; Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc Cohen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[复制链接]
楼主: 自由
发表于 2025-3-23 11:21:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:49:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:09:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:18:02 | 显示全部楼层
Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc CohenSocratic method of questioning and refutation (elenchus) predominates the early Platonic dialogues.Early dialogues were intended to commemorate Socrates and the elenchus.Uncovering the shortcomings th
发表于 2025-3-24 03:01:43 | 显示全部楼层
The Socratic Method, so-called Socratic elenchus. This is a species of philosophical analysis whose aim is to arrive at the definition of a problematic concept by means of subjecting alternative proposals to potential refutation by means of counterexample. Six key features of the method are delineated.
发表于 2025-3-24 10:01:25 | 显示全部楼层
Analyzing Courage: ,, but Socrates shows them all to be defective. Their efforts end in perplexity, leading us to wonder whether the elenchus, as a form of inquiry, holds out a serious prospect of leading to the discovery of what courage is.
发表于 2025-3-24 13:50:42 | 显示全部楼层
Blameworthy Ignorance: ,are so dismal? We might hope to find an answer in the .. There we find a possible motivation for the elenchus in a principle of “epistemic purity”—the idea that one ought not to think one knows something that, in fact, one does not know.
发表于 2025-3-24 17:10:16 | 显示全部楼层
Virtue in Socratic Ignorance: , will ever be entirely satisfactory? The . may provide an answer, for it raises the possibility that the virtue that is the topic of this dialogue, . (self-mastery), may actually turn out to be the limited wisdom that Socrates claims to have, namely, self-knowledge.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:47:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 00:36:02 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,re are both internal and external limitations in what the elenchus can be reasonably expected to accomplish. And Plato also thought that philosophy can do more to get beyond those limitations. Only by going beyond the elenctic method will we be able to adequately address the foundational questions of philosophy.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 02:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表