找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Why Criminalize?; New Perspectives on Thomas Søbirk Petersen Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Principles of criminalization.W

[复制链接]
查看: 41627|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 16:17:19 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Why Criminalize?
副标题New Perspectives on
编辑Thomas Søbirk Petersen
视频video
概述Offers a brand new criticism of well-known and central principles of criminalization.Delivers the first modern (since the days of Bentham and Mill) defense of a utilitarian principle of criminalizatio
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Why Criminalize?; New Perspectives on  Thomas Søbirk Petersen Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Principles of criminalization.W
描述The book defines and critically discusses the following five principles: the harm principle, legal paternalism, the offense principle, legal moralism and the dignity principle of criminalization. The book argues that all five principles raise important problems that point to rejections (or at least a rethink) of standard principles of criminalization.. .The book shows that one of the reasons why we should reject or revise standard principles of criminalization is that even the most plausible versions of the harm principle and legal paternalism that have been offered so far are rendered redundant by general moral theories. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the other three principles (or versions thereof), the offense principle, legal moralism and the dignity principle of criminalization, can either be covered by the harm principle, thus making these principles also redundant, or be seen to have what look like other unacceptable implications (e.g. that versions of legal moralism are based on speculative and incorrect empirical assumptions or violate what is called the criminological levelling-down challenge). As such, there is reason to move beyond traditional principles of criminali
出版日期Book 2020
关键词Principles of criminalization; What to criminalize; Legal moralism; The harm principle; Utilitarianism a
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34690-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-34692-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-34690-4Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Why Criminalize?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Why Criminalize?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Why Criminalize?网络公开度




书目名称Why Criminalize?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Why Criminalize?被引频次




书目名称Why Criminalize?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Why Criminalize?年度引用




书目名称Why Criminalize?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Why Criminalize?读者反馈




书目名称Why Criminalize?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:37:01 | 显示全部楼层
Harm and Criminalization: On Why Harm Principles Are Redundant,better understanding of when an individual is being harmed by another individual than the other baselines discussed, even though it has problematic implications of its own. The counterfactual baseline says, roughly, that a person P1 is harmed by another person P2 doing C, if and only if P1’s well-be
发表于 2025-3-22 02:19:15 | 显示全部楼层
No Offense! On the Offense Principle and Some New Challenges,n of harm, deployed by leading proponents of the offense principle such as Feinberg, A. P. Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, as a ‘setback to interests’ is both difficult to apply to the distinction between harming and causing offence and in itself inadequately supported.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:06:23 | 显示全部楼层
New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges,he main argument for this thesis is that, in its more modern versions, legal moralism is immune to some of the powerful challenges to Devlin made by Hart, Dworkin and Feinberg, among others. As an example of this, it is shown that, while it follows from Devlin’s position that the state should enforc
发表于 2025-3-22 10:02:58 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2020o have what look like other unacceptable implications (e.g. that versions of legal moralism are based on speculative and incorrect empirical assumptions or violate what is called the criminological levelling-down challenge). As such, there is reason to move beyond traditional principles of criminali
发表于 2025-3-22 16:04:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:31:04 | 显示全部楼层
Thomas Søbirk Petersenxamined by that laboratory. Quality assurance (QA) for such a laboratory includes all of the activities associated with insuring that chemical and physical measurements are made properly, interpreted correctly and reported with appropriate estimates of error and confidence levels. QA activities also
发表于 2025-3-23 01:00:21 | 显示全部楼层
Thomas Søbirk Petersen community analysis of in situ benthic macroinvertebrates (Hudson and Ciborowksi, 1995) and plants (Lovett Doust et al., 1994; Tracy et al., 1995; Sgro and Johansen, 1995), and in sentinel biomonitor studies (Rosenberg and Resh, 1993; Corkum et al., 1995). These studies indicate the enormity of the
发表于 2025-3-23 02:49:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:28:46 | 显示全部楼层
n the 1980s and 1990s, based on mcotine and strobilurin, major inventions were made in bringing to the market compounds, such as Bayer’s (Germany) imidacloprid (.) and ICI (UK) A5504 (azoxystrobm) (.), shown in .. In addition, BASF also has invented a strobilurin analog called kresoxlme methyl (BAS4
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 22:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表