找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War; A Challenge for Theo Peter Viggo Jakobsen Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

[复制链接]
查看: 18397|回复: 34
发表于 2025-3-21 18:20:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War
副标题A Challenge for Theo
编辑Peter Viggo Jakobsen
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War; A Challenge for Theo Peter Viggo Jakobsen Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of
描述This book fills a gap in the literature on coercion and assesses the usefulness of coercive diplomacy in the post-Cold war era. The theoretical framework explains why coercive diplomacy politics succeed or fail, identifies the conditions under which Western states will be willing to back coercive strategies with use of limited force and highlights how the need for collective action affects the use of coercion. The framework is tested empirically in analyses of the Gulf crisis, the Yugoslav wars and the Haiti crisis.
出版日期Book 1998
关键词cold war; conflict; democracy; Diplomacy; politics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373570
isbn_ebook978-0-230-37357-0
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War网络公开度




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War被引频次




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War被引频次学科排名




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War年度引用




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War年度引用学科排名




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War读者反馈




书目名称Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:45:07 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/w/image/1027562.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 03:02:47 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373570cold war; conflict; democracy; Diplomacy; politics
发表于 2025-3-22 07:23:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:49:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:33:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:44:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:28:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:18:17 | 显示全部楼层
Book 1998ork explains why coercive diplomacy politics succeed or fail, identifies the conditions under which Western states will be willing to back coercive strategies with use of limited force and highlights how the need for collective action affects the use of coercion. The framework is tested empirically
发表于 2025-3-23 08:25:41 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 05:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表