找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma; Gaps as Traps Mariella Falkenhain Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[复制链接]
查看: 40290|回复: 55
发表于 2025-3-21 16:10:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma
副标题Gaps as Traps
编辑Mariella Falkenhain
视频video
概述Offers a fresh perspective on policymaking, implementation and policy effects in hybrid regimes.Examines how NGOs respond to malfunctioning policies.Provides in-depth comparative case studies on crimi
丛书名称International Series on Public Policy
图书封面Titlebook: Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma; Gaps as Traps Mariella Falkenhain Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),
描述“.Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma. is especially important and welcome since it offers a very incisive analysis of the role of NGOs in transitional democracies and the effect of institutional setting on NGO effectiveness in representing citizen interests.  This book offers a very creative conceptual framework and timely, penetrating case studies which provide valuable insights on NGO strategy, governmental capacity, and the possibilities for social change.”.Steven Rathgeb Smith, Executive Director, American Political Science Association, and Georgetown University, USA. .This book provides a novel analytical perspective on policymaking, policy effects and NGOs in hybrid regimes. It examines the sources and patterns of gaps between formal rules, political practice and longer term effects, and explores how NGOs navigate the tension-laden environments that gaps represent. The book shows how weak institutionsand malfunctioning policies turn NGOs into ambivalent actors. Empirically, it covers criminal justice and social protection policies in post-Soviet Georgia and Armenia. The findings from the in-depth case studies are then extended by a discussion of gaps in hybrid regim
出版日期Book 2020
关键词institutions; governance; institutional gaps; post-Soviet space; NGOs; decoupling; methodology; institution
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39742-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-39744-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-39742-5Series ISSN 2524-7301 Series E-ISSN 2524-731X
issn_series 2524-7301
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma网络公开度




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma被引频次




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma被引频次学科排名




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma年度引用




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma年度引用学科排名




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma读者反馈




书目名称Weak Institutions and the Governance Dilemma读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:19:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:33:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:23:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:11:50 | 显示全部楼层
Theorizing Gaps in Hybrid Regimes,t, policy capacity in government, and informal institutions influence the extent and nature of gaps. After differentiating between two possible modes of gaps, the chapter discusses potential implications of gaps for governments and NGOs across regimes. It ends with an inventory of gaps based on ontological, analytical and substantive differences.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:00:47 | 显示全部楼层
Social Protection in Georgia: NGOs in a Field of Low Political Salience,n increasingly failed to remedy the gap from below. The second part of the chapter turns to NGOs as gap agents. It highlights their efforts to activate informal care and the challenges they faced in advocating for systemic change.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:22:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:26:48 | 显示全部楼层
Theorizing Gaps in Hybrid Regimes,t, policy capacity in government, and informal institutions influence the extent and nature of gaps. After differentiating between two possible modes of gaps, the chapter discusses potential implications of gaps for governments and NGOs across regimes. It ends with an inventory of gaps based on ontological, analytical and substantive differences.
发表于 2025-3-23 02:56:20 | 显示全部楼层
Social Protection in Georgia: NGOs in a Field of Low Political Salience,n increasingly failed to remedy the gap from below. The second part of the chapter turns to NGOs as gap agents. It highlights their efforts to activate informal care and the challenges they faced in advocating for systemic change.
发表于 2025-3-23 09:16:06 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 16:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表