Titlebook: (Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein; Anat Biletzki Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003 Ludwig Wittgenstein.interpret.issue

烦忧

RADE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57711-1he issue of language, in general, and the more specific problems about language — the relationship between language and world, the question of meaning (and meaninglessness), the limits of sense, etc. Under the auspices of that general issue it might have seemed that nothing new could be done beyond

柏树

Exposure

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57711-1historical context of logicism, spawned by Frege and Russell, as the project of reducing mathematics to logic, and the specific content of Wittgenstein’s work having to do with mathematics (with or without its connection to logic). Given that context, such forgetfulness would be inexcusable; Wittgen

无法治愈

Lecture Notes in Computer Science spiritual into our talk of religion, thereby broadening Wittgenstein’s field of talk about religion to include his talk of the mystical and the spiritual, and inserting interpretation of the mystical into interpretation of the religious. We have encountered the mystical before, while investigating

煞费苦心

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21283-3is second type of avenue was traveled, by and large, far and wide, by the interpreters of his thought on religion. But how does one interpret Wittgenstein on something about which he said nothing? What can one mean by the phrase “Wittgenstein on social science,” knowing that Wittgenstein wrote nary

Evocative

cortex

MILK

Book 2003roject of interpreting Wittgenstein. As a cultural history of ideas, it traces the parallelism between Wittgenstein interpretation and the move from metaphysics, to language, to postmodernism effected in the twentieth century.

暖昧关系