Harrison 发表于 2025-3-21 16:07:37
书目名称Giving Reasons影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Giving Reasons读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0385803<br><br> <br><br>门闩 发表于 2025-3-21 22:52:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_2.png钩针织物 发表于 2025-3-22 01:03:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_3.png钳子 发表于 2025-3-22 06:52:52
The Logical Dimension of Argumentation,ons, it follows that, if argumentation is a complex of logical, dialectical and rhetorical properties, as contended in Chapter 3, then good argumentation will be argumentation satisfying logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions..Yet, the other side of this coin is that argumentative normativitVsd168 发表于 2025-3-22 12:20:24
The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation,have to fulfill two tasks: on the one hand, showing that any type of argumentation, whether dialogical or monological, involves such a dialectical dimension; but on the other hand, showing that dialectical normativity cannot be reduced to argumentative normativity ...In this chapter, I deal with the旅行路线 发表于 2025-3-22 15:03:15
The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation,ncept of argumentative value..In order to show the specifics of this proposal, I outline current strategies for dealing with the rhetorical within Argumentation Theory. This task is partly carried out by following the criticisms that C. Kock has raised against the three main theories of argumentatio旅行路线 发表于 2025-3-22 17:59:10
Argumentation Appraisal,heory. Consequently, I deal with the logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions that determine whether an act of arguing succeeds at its constitutive goal of showing a target claim to be correct..As pointed out in Chapter 1, in our account, the analysis of argumentation is to be displayed on twoCT-angiography 发表于 2025-3-22 21:28:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3cifics of linguistic communication. In addition, it is meant to show in which ways the activity of arguing is particularly akin to humans as rational and social beings: on the one hand, it is a tool to make our beliefs and claims rational, that is, a justificatory device; on the other, it is a means吗啡 发表于 2025-3-23 03:09:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_9.png惰性气体 发表于 2025-3-23 09:24:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_10.png