MOAT
发表于 2025-3-25 03:20:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_21.png
苦笑
发表于 2025-3-25 07:47:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_22.png
MERIT
发表于 2025-3-25 13:04:53
Why Do We Need a New Theory of Argumentation?,avoid instrumentalism in proposing a normative model for argumentation is to characterize argumentation goodness in terms of justification. Then, in Section 2.5, I explain that adopting such non-instrumentalist view is, in addition, the only way to overcome the . that normative models for argumentat
Critical
发表于 2025-3-25 17:35:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_24.png
deriver
发表于 2025-3-25 20:50:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_25.png
GLOSS
发表于 2025-3-26 00:50:09
The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation,ical normative conditions of argumentation are constitutive respecting its justificatory dimension – or, in other words, that for a piece of communication to be considered argumentation, it has to fulfill certain dialectical conditions. In turn, such dialectical conditions happen to be regulative re
enmesh
发表于 2025-3-26 05:27:19
The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation,h strategy for incorporating a rhetorical perspective within our normative models. According to it, every piece of argumentation has to be analyzed and, more importantly, appraised from a rhetorical perspective..The idea of including rhetorical conditions for determining the value of a piece of argu
单调女
发表于 2025-3-26 09:15:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_28.png
机制
发表于 2025-3-26 15:12:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_29.png
ADAGE
发表于 2025-3-26 19:15:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54163-6avoid instrumentalism in proposing a normative model for argumentation is to characterize argumentation goodness in terms of justification. Then, in Section 2.5, I explain that adopting such non-instrumentalist view is, in addition, the only way to overcome the . that normative models for argumentat