LVAD360 发表于 2025-3-26 22:00:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_31.png知识 发表于 2025-3-27 01:32:53
Rolf-Ulrich Sprenger,Michael Rauscherulmin first presented in . (1958), both as a leading work on the nature of Logic and as an attempt at providing a tool for argumentation appraisal. Afterwards, I explain the differences between Toulmin’s approach and mine by considering the criticisms that his conception of Logic has received. One ooverrule 发表于 2025-3-27 08:24:11
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230001213ical normative conditions of argumentation are constitutive respecting its justificatory dimension – or, in other words, that for a piece of communication to be considered argumentation, it has to fulfill certain dialectical conditions. In turn, such dialectical conditions happen to be regulative re方舟 发表于 2025-3-27 10:34:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01352-3h strategy for incorporating a rhetorical perspective within our normative models. According to it, every piece of argumentation has to be analyzed and, more importantly, appraised from a rhetorical perspective..The idea of including rhetorical conditions for determining the value of a piece of arguCREEK 发表于 2025-3-27 16:30:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_35.png蚊子 发表于 2025-3-27 18:47:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_36.pngExpostulate 发表于 2025-3-27 22:11:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_37.pnglaceration 发表于 2025-3-28 02:38:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_38.png