易受骗
发表于 2025-3-23 11:14:03
Rolf-Ulrich Sprenger,Michael Rauscherons, it follows that, if argumentation is a complex of logical, dialectical and rhetorical properties, as contended in Chapter 3, then good argumentation will be argumentation satisfying logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions..Yet, the other side of this coin is that argumentative normativit
Conquest
发表于 2025-3-23 15:16:33
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230001213have to fulfill two tasks: on the one hand, showing that any type of argumentation, whether dialogical or monological, involves such a dialectical dimension; but on the other hand, showing that dialectical normativity cannot be reduced to argumentative normativity ...In this chapter, I deal with the
最低点
发表于 2025-3-23 21:10:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01352-3ncept of argumentative value..In order to show the specifics of this proposal, I outline current strategies for dealing with the rhetorical within Argumentation Theory. This task is partly carried out by following the criticisms that C. Kock has raised against the three main theories of argumentatio
Cryptic
发表于 2025-3-24 00:49:00
Adriana Calvelli,Chiara Cannavaleheory. Consequently, I deal with the logical, dialectical and rhetorical conditions that determine whether an act of arguing succeeds at its constitutive goal of showing a target claim to be correct..As pointed out in Chapter 1, in our account, the analysis of argumentation is to be displayed on two
acetylcholine
发表于 2025-3-24 03:01:00
978-94-007-3784-6Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
发怨言
发表于 2025-3-24 06:39:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_16.png
护身符
发表于 2025-3-24 10:50:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_17.png
挥舞
发表于 2025-3-24 18:40:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_18.png
阴谋
发表于 2025-3-24 21:00:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3859/385803/385803_19.png
折磨
发表于 2025-3-25 02:28:49
Book 2011s of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretat