参考书目
发表于 2025-3-25 06:16:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319357/319357_21.png
CHURL
发表于 2025-3-25 11:20:06
A Formal Treatment of Case Studies presented here in full detail. The presentation is taken from Pearce and Rantala (1984a) — with some important corrections—where many-sorted infinitary logics and nonstandard analysis were engaged and certain well-known axiomatizations used as a starting point..
制定法律
发表于 2025-3-25 14:05:24
Prologue: The Correspondence Principleas also said that in order for a scientific change in a more general sense to be continuous or cumulative (in some intuitive meanings of the words) the principle should apply to it. As we shall see later, we can even consider this principle from a more universal point of view and insist that somethi
牲畜栏
发表于 2025-3-25 16:40:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319357/319357_24.png
某人
发表于 2025-3-25 22:39:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319357/319357_25.png
BACLE
发表于 2025-3-26 00:35:27
Global Translationnd languages must be explored more globally. In the present chapter, I generalize the earlier ideas about local translation by studying a global version (concerning literary works) of what was in Chapter 2 called explanatory translation. The notion will cover, as earlier, both translations between t
枯萎将要
发表于 2025-3-26 06:33:00
The Correspondence Relationto some actual cases of scientific change. I shall not consider such Kuhnian questions as how scientific changes have taken place historically, how communication breakdowns have been handled and scientists persuaded by means of translation or learning, or how scientists have experienced the changes.
Intrepid
发表于 2025-3-26 08:44:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319357/319357_28.png
有组织
发表于 2025-3-26 15:17:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3194/319357/319357_29.png
赞成你
发表于 2025-3-26 20:29:00
Theories and Logicss in the next chapter. Logically educated readers will find most of the principles familiar from the literature, but the details are presented in the form that best suits my purposes. The basic idea is here that the logical tools chosen should not excessively constrain metascientific studies, but sh