inroad
发表于 2025-3-21 16:33:20
书目名称Anyone Who Has a View影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Anyone Who Has a View读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0158864<br><br> <br><br>
颂扬国家
发表于 2025-3-21 23:11:28
,Toulmin’s Warrants, about it. And I respond to criticisms of the concept by (.), (.) and (.). Their criticisms show the need for some revision of Toulmin’s position, but his basic concept of warrant, I shall argue, should be retained as a central concept for the evaluation of arguments.
联邦
发表于 2025-3-22 00:57:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_3.png
Cupping
发表于 2025-3-22 05:33:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_4.png
Outshine
发表于 2025-3-22 10:35:53
Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric,ive years or so, a flurry of activity has raised the profile of these questions in this community, particularly with the focus on how dialectic and rhetoric and their relationships bear on the identification, interpretation and assessment of arguments and argumentation (see the special issues of . edited by ., and by .).
他姓手中拿着
发表于 2025-3-22 16:56:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38418-0 a metadialogue relative to the first dialogue. It will be about this first dialogue and perhaps some related dialogues. Also, its primary purpose is to help this first dialogue achieve its end: in this sense the metadialogue will be embedded in the ground level dialogue.
季雨
发表于 2025-3-22 20:20:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_7.png
visceral-fat
发表于 2025-3-23 00:17:26
Problemstellung, Zielformulierung,insuperable difficulties. They propose, instead, that rationality be understood in terms of judgment rather than (or in addition to) rules. Govier criticizes some of my previous work on the subject for being overly committed to the classical model, and for equivocating on ‘judgment.’
不可接触
发表于 2025-3-23 04:16:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_9.png
沐浴
发表于 2025-3-23 06:23:49
Rationality and Judgment,insuperable difficulties. They propose, instead, that rationality be understood in terms of judgment rather than (or in addition to) rules. Govier criticizes some of my previous work on the subject for being overly committed to the classical model, and for equivocating on ‘judgment.’