动机
发表于 2025-3-27 00:01:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_31.png
非秘密
发表于 2025-3-27 01:28:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_32.png
得体
发表于 2025-3-27 07:09:40
The Rabbit in the Hat, I think these rules individually, and as a set, have a great deal of intuitive plausibility in their favour. Therefore, in this essay, I propose to look at the rules more closely and ask where they come from, how they may be justified, and whether there is any internal connection between them as a group.
观点
发表于 2025-3-27 10:02:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_34.png
过分
发表于 2025-3-27 13:54:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_35.png
Enliven
发表于 2025-3-27 20:16:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_36.png
去才蔑视
发表于 2025-3-27 23:52:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_37.png
Scintigraphy
发表于 2025-3-28 02:18:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_38.png
协定
发表于 2025-3-28 09:23:17
,Zähler für besondere Verwendungszwecke,f himself, than his alleged discovery of a new type or mode of logical reasoning commonly referred to as abduction. In a retrospective note written in 1902 Peirce in this respect even declared himself “an explorer upon untrodden ground.” (CP 2.102). Whether or not this boasting judgment was indeed justified, we shall have to see.
混杂人
发表于 2025-3-28 10:38:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83519-3Since I originally proposed that arguments require a dialectical tier, many commentators have weighed in with objections and challenges. Originally (.), then (.), (.), (.), (.), (.), (.) and (.) — to mention just those who have gone on record with objections to that proposal.