网络添麻烦
发表于 2025-3-28 15:26:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_41.png
高脚酒杯
发表于 2025-3-28 21:57:02
,Terminmärkte für Elektrizität,This presentation of the current state of argumentation studies in France will focus on four points.
要素
发表于 2025-3-29 00:15:25
The Dialectical Tier Revisited,Since I originally proposed that arguments require a dialectical tier, many commentators have weighed in with objections and challenges. Originally (.), then (.), (.), (.), (.), (.), (.) and (.) — to mention just those who have gone on record with objections to that proposal.
脱水
发表于 2025-3-29 04:01:17
Logical Fallacies, Dialectical Transgressions, Rhetorical Sins, and Other Failures of Rationality iWhen does . become .? Is it ever wrong to argue — making . a fallacy? Could it be a fallacy . to argue — the fallacy of .? If audiences are elements of arguments, is there a class of .?.. and . and ., as well as ., and . are all bad things to do in argumentation. Do they all deserve the name “fallacy”?
Cardiac
发表于 2025-3-29 11:12:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_45.png
Relinquish
发表于 2025-3-29 14:26:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8Argumentation Theory; Nation; argue; discourse; formal logic; logic
软弱
发表于 2025-3-29 16:17:34
978-1-4020-1456-7Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003
性学院
发表于 2025-3-29 20:41:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_48.png
GUISE
发表于 2025-3-30 00:39:23
Trägheit des Magnetfeldes und Wechselströme This thesis requires some clarification. When critically evaluating an argument purportedly giving us good reason to accept its conclusion, we are taking the role of a challenger in a simple dialectical exchange. The person who put forward the argument is the proponent. His role is to advance an in
承认
发表于 2025-3-30 06:19:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1589/158864/158864_50.png