Titlebook: Villagers of the Maros; A Portrait of an Ear John M. O’Shea Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996 archaeological theory.b

Tincture

The Maros Group and the Early Bronze Age in the Eastern Carpathian Basinltural landscape of the south Hungarian Plain necessarily touches on elements of the physical landscape as well as on the contemporary groups in the region, both of which were introduced in Chapter 3.

诱惑

碎片

The Archaeological Study of Funerary Practicesurce of intact and often exotic artifacts, but they also represent one of the few archaeological contexts in which we have direct access to specific individuals from the past. The individual may be a very specific one, in the case of literate societies in which the individual’s name may adorn the to

一个搅动不安

宏伟

The Cemeteries of the Maros Groupéba, investigated in 1903, and Ószentiván, with excavations beginning in 1926, figured prominently in Childe’s synthesis of the character of the Perjámos culture (Childe 1929). In the decades immediately following, a number of Maros cemeteries were excavated in Hungary under the direction of Móra Fe

Gudgeon

MORT

稀释前

Symbolism and Differentiation across the Maros Villagesthere to a series of examinations designed to reveal the underlying character of the social categories and statuses that structured the funerary program. The goal of this chapter is to assess the extent to which these patterns of differentiation and social symbolism are shared among the Maros cemete

巫婆

The Maros Group and the Early Bronze Age in the Eastern Carpathian Basincommunities and the larger society of the Maros group. In these discussions, the social and environmental background has frequently been alluded to. In this chapter, the character of interactions between the Maros villages and their neighbors is brought to the foreground. The consideration of the cu

星球的光亮度