找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Views of Nature and Dualism ; Rethinking Philosoph Thomas John Hastings,Knut-Willy Sæther Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

[复制链接]
楼主: EXERT
发表于 2025-3-25 07:23:33 | 显示全部楼层
The Role of Panentheism and Pantheism for Environmental Well-Being,l God-world monism essential to pantheism are less significant than one might think. Both panentheism and pantheism emphasize the divinity of the physical, bodily, and natural world, making the relative benefits of pantheism small compared to panentheism.
发表于 2025-3-25 09:19:09 | 显示全部楼层
Landscapes of the Unconscious and the Longings of Nature,inal psychoanalysis on melancholy to bring out the themes of the unconscious desire for mutually beneficial interconnectivity (the trees), melancholic expressions of nature, and the maternal as the womblike depth of nature that nurtures human awakening and creativity.
发表于 2025-3-25 12:05:48 | 显示全部楼层
Reading the Signs of the Times: Nature-Culture Dualism and Human Feeling in the Anthropocene,mining modernity’s reading of nature/culture dualism and considering its impact on climate change discourse. She then turns to a semiotic reading of encounters between creatures to clarify the relationship between nature/culture and human feeling.
发表于 2025-3-25 17:27:57 | 显示全部楼层
Pentecostal Emotive (Non)Dualism: Pneumatology, Worship, and Context,logy and then moves to emotions. Pentecostals claim that it is the Spirit moving in and through the world, inviting people to experience and participate in creation, providing potential resources for our ecological reality.
发表于 2025-3-25 21:35:37 | 显示全部楼层
,The Role of Formal Distinction in the Articulation of ,: “Neutral” and “Expressive” , in the Thinkiconstitutes a part of their reasoning. However, even though the formal distinction is pivotal for seeing being as univocal, the two thinkers have very different versions of univocity. For logical and theological reasons, Scotus neutralizes the univocity of being, while Spinoza affirms it.
发表于 2025-3-26 00:24:50 | 显示全部楼层
You Are What You See: Environmental Ethics from Aesthetic Experience Via David Bentley Hart and Gil not support firm boundaries between individuals and their environments. They are thus open to the possibility of aesthetic approaches to environmental ethics which do not require disinterestedness; the interests and desires of a subject are necessary considerations for an ethical evaluation of their relationship to their environment.
发表于 2025-3-26 05:25:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:34:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:38:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:49:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-9-20 21:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表