找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Vieweg Lexikon Technik; Maschinenbau · Elekt Alfred Böge Book 1997 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden 19

[复制链接]
楼主: 分类
发表于 2025-3-23 10:08:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:31:52 | 显示全部楼层
Alfred Bögeave only rarely adopted a systemic-functional (Berber Sardinha and Barbara, 2009) or classical rhetorical framework (Isaksson, 2005; Nørreklit, 2003; see Zachry, 2009 for an overview), so this chapter suggests a new area where these approaches may be applied.
发表于 2025-3-23 19:02:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:13:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 05:51:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:14:10 | 显示全部楼层
Alfred Bögey stories of J.R.R. Tolkien (see Fimi, 2009). I will argue that such alternative histories of leisure can be seen as ways in which free, rational choices about good and bad are made free from persuasion; and ways in which we can avoid the wrong, instrumental choices. However, there is an irony in th
发表于 2025-3-24 14:44:31 | 显示全部楼层
Alfred Bögemany of the everyday aliments that the poor suffered from, especially those connected with deficient diets (in terms of both quantity and quality of food), lack of access to potable water, and unsanitary living conditions. These same material resources often allowed them to survive epidemic outbreak
发表于 2025-3-24 16:54:42 | 显示全部楼层
Alfred Bögen reform, the division of labor and forms of preindustrial construction. They formed the heart of artisanal movements in revolutions; they were the first participants in the massive labor migration from the countryside to the cities; they were victims and beneficiaries of the industrial re-organizat
发表于 2025-3-24 23:02:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 01:10:29 | 显示全部楼层
Alfred Bögender participants’ engagement with representations. We present a theoretical framework that looks at these choices from the experiential perspectives of narrati978-3-031-01077-4978-3-031-02205-0Series ISSN 1946-7680 Series E-ISSN 1946-7699
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-5 22:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表