Titlebook: Validating Technological Innovation; The Introduction and David Coniam,Peter Falvey Book 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 201

ORBIT

Coronary

Judicious

LINES

The Fourth Validation Study: A Qualitative Examination of the Attitudes of Liberal Studies (LS) Marcompulsory subject in Hong Kong’s new senior secondary school curriculum and when the candidature was much smaller at 3300. This qualitative validation study describes semi-structured interviews with Liberal Studies markers who provided in-depth opinions on key aspects of the OSM process. Markers we

等级的上升

The Fifth Validation Study: Examining Negative Attitudes Towards OSM in Hong Kong,compared with marking on paper compared with eight markers who were generally positive about onscreen marking. The validation study described in this chapter arose as a direct response to concerns expressed by senior stakeholders that the attitudes of the two groups of markers (i.e., negative versus

施加

,The Sixth Validation Study: Assessing the Ease of Use in the Environment and Markers’ Acceptance ofssue was that some markers were not as positive as might have been expected – given the English Language markers’ reactions to the enhanced support from the system. Concern was expressed about the feedback and support provided to markers on the accuracy of their marking. It was considered that this

顽固

,The Seventh Validation Study: The Increasing Acceptance of Onscreen Marking: The ‘iPad Effect’,an entire cohort of markers for one of the Hong Kong Year 13 public examinations in English, the 2012 Hong Kong Advanced Level Examination Use of English, Paper C. While the study replicated the methodology for previous research conducted into the marking of Liberal Studies in Hong Kong which is des

净礼

,The Eighth Validation Study: The Effects of Key Demographic Variables on Markers’ Perceived Ease offactors: the language of marking; gender; and age on marker reactions to onscreen marking. A total of 1743 markers completed a post-marking questionnaire consisting of two previously validated scales, i.e., . and .. Rasch analysis results showed that the two scales had good psychometric properties.

偏见

歹徒