找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Validating Psychological Constructs; Historical, Philosop Kathleen Slaney Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co

[复制链接]
查看: 52645|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 16:07:06 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs
副标题Historical, Philosop
编辑Kathleen Slaney
视频video
概述Explores the history and development of construct validity theory (CVT) in relation to the broader domain of psychological measurement.Critically examines CVT in a broader context.Brings together hist
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology
图书封面Titlebook: Validating Psychological Constructs; Historical, Philosop Kathleen Slaney Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co
描述This book critically examines the historical and philosophical foundations of construct validity theory (CVT), and how these have and continue to inform and constrain the conceptualization of validity and its application in research. CVT has had an immense impact on how researchers in the behavioural sciences conceptualize and approach their subject matter. Yet, there is equivocation regarding the foundations of the CVT framework as well as ambiguities concerning the nature of the “constructs” that are its raison d’etre. The book is organized in terms of three major parts that speak, respectively, to the historical, philosophical, and pragmatic dimensions of CVT. The primary objective is to provide researchers and students with a critical lens through which a deeper understanding may be gained of both the utility and limitations of CVT and the validation practices to which it has given rise. 
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Construct Validity Theory; Classical Test Theory; Modern Test Theory; Loevinger; Spearman; Philosophy of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-38523-9
isbn_softcover978-1-349-67805-1
isbn_ebook978-1-137-38523-9Series ISSN 2946-2452 Series E-ISSN 2946-2460
issn_series 2946-2452
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs网络公开度




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs被引频次




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs被引频次学科排名




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs年度引用




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs年度引用学科排名




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs读者反馈




书目名称Validating Psychological Constructs读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:44:14 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,construct’ concept and the ripple effects of its introduction into the psychological literature from the late 1940s to early 1950s. The chapter also provides a description of important discrepancies in the published literature concerning both the ‘construct’ concept and the utility of CVT as a valid
发表于 2025-3-22 02:29:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:01:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:41:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:07:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:03:32 | 显示全部楼层
The Philosophical Backdrop of Construct Validityportant developments in the philosophy of science from the mid-1920s to the early 1960s. Emphasis is placed on the distinction between logical positivism and scientific realism and on key areas of difference between them. Also described is the transition between the heavily empiricist doctrines of l
发表于 2025-3-22 23:36:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:10:55 | 显示全部楼层
Some Conceptual Housecleaningluding the ever-evasive ‘construct’ concept and its progenitor, the ‘hypothetical construct.’ The various ontological stances that have been adopted regarding constructs are summarized. Concrete examples of confusing or otherwise ambiguous uses of these terms are given, and a common but pernicious t
发表于 2025-3-23 07:39:22 | 显示全部楼层
Construct Validation: View from the “Trenches”1990s to current. The chapter then shifts in focus from scholarship . how to validate constructs to a description of construct validation research . lived and practiced. The major findings from a fairly recent body of empirical research dedicated to the examination of psychometric reporting and vali
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 02:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表