Titlebook: Topics in Scandinavian Syntax; Lars Hellan,Kirsti Koch Christensen Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986 Flexive.Index.Syntax.object

ethnology

Some Comments on Reflexivization in Icelandic,n’s theory makes some predictions which are not borne out by the facts, while Maling’s notion of predication often makes it difficult to see what the predictions of her theory actually are. Occasionally, I will hint at other explanations, but these comments do not present any coherent theory of Icel

背心

, and the Binding Theory,t of the properties of the Norwegian relative marker .. On the other hand, this result depends on two specific modifications of the Binding Theory, and the success of the analysis presented here constitutes evidence for these modifications.

栏杆

COMP, INFL, and Germanic Word Order,is that the different placements of the finite verb and related phenomena in these languages can be ascribed to a small set of grammatical differences, mainly involving different distributions of the properties assigned to COMP and INFL. Specifically, I will argue that S is a headed category, and th

预兆好

On Auxiliaries, AUX and VPS in Icelandic,ct any distinction in Icelandic between auxiliary and non-auxiliary verbs.. In this connection it turned out to be necessary to try to clarify the status of the VP in Icelandic, assess the evidence for a separate AUX (or INFL) node and do various types of basic descriptive spadework. As a result, th

Oratory

mucous-membrane

后天习得

0924-4670 contributions - those by Maling, Herslund, Cooper, Platzack and Thniinsson - are developments of papers read at this workshop, and all of the contributions reflect (and have partly inspired) the strong momentum which this area of research has gained over the last few years. It is our hope that the

wreathe

The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives,ion of reflexives with imperative formation, is considered complete unless it provides an analysis of reflexives in English. The principles of the Government/Binding (GB) theory, in particular, rest centrally on the distinction between anaphors and non-anaphors, and thus on the properties of reflexives.

未开化

COMP, INFL, and Germanic Word Order,, mainly involving different distributions of the properties assigned to COMP and INFL. Specifically, I will argue that S is a headed category, and that the choice of head of S is a parameter, the value of which singles out English from the other Germanic languages.

传染