找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: The Systematicity Arguments; Kenneth Aizawa Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003 Connectionism.Thought.cognitive scienc

[复制链接]
查看: 50925|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:30:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称The Systematicity Arguments
编辑Kenneth Aizawa
视频video
丛书名称Studies in Brain and Mind
图书封面Titlebook: The Systematicity Arguments;  Kenneth Aizawa Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003 Connectionism.Thought.cognitive scienc
描述This book addresses a part of a problem. The problem is to determine the architecture of cognition, that is, the basic structures and mechanisms underlying cognitive processing. This is a multidimensional problem insofar as there appear to be many distinct types of mechanisms that interact in diverse ways during cognitive processing. Thus, we have memory, attention, learning, sensation, perception, and who knows what else, interacting to produce behavior. As a case in point, consider a bit of linguistic behavior. To tell a friend that I think Greg won a stunning victory, I must evidently rely on various bits of information stored in my memory, including who my friends are, who Greg is, what he won, and what natural languages I share with my friend. I must sense and perceive that my friend is within hearing distance, how loud I need to speak, how loud I am speaking, and whether my friend is paying attention. I must avail myself of what I know about the language I share with my friend, along with innumerable principles about human "folk psychology. " This book does not address the full range of contemporary theorizing about cognitive architecture, but only a part. It addresses theori
出版日期Book 2003
关键词Connectionism; Thought; cognitive science; mind; philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0275-3
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-7284-0
isbn_ebook978-1-4615-0275-3Series ISSN 1573-4536 Series E-ISSN 2468-399X
issn_series 1573-4536
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 2003
The information of publication is updating

书目名称The Systematicity Arguments影响因子(影响力)




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments网络公开度




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments网络公开度学科排名




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments被引频次




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments被引频次学科排名




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments年度引用




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments年度引用学科排名




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments读者反馈




书目名称The Systematicity Arguments读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:17:34 | 显示全部楼层
第120912主题贴--第2楼 (沙发)
发表于 2025-3-22 03:06:54 | 显示全部楼层
板凳
发表于 2025-3-22 07:21:34 | 显示全部楼层
第4楼
发表于 2025-3-22 08:58:15 | 显示全部楼层
5楼
发表于 2025-3-22 15:35:11 | 显示全部楼层
6楼
发表于 2025-3-22 19:25:24 | 显示全部楼层
7楼
发表于 2025-3-23 00:07:27 | 显示全部楼层
8楼
发表于 2025-3-23 03:57:46 | 显示全部楼层
9楼
发表于 2025-3-23 07:02:41 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-8 06:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表