书目名称 | The Question of Being in Husserl’s Logical Investigations | 编辑 | James R. Mensch | 视频video | | 丛书名称 | Phaenomenologica | 图书封面 |  | 描述 | This study proposes a double thesis. The first concerns the Logische Untersuchungen itself. We will attempt to show that its statements about the nature of being are inconsistent and that this inconsis tency is responsible for the failure of this work. The second con cerns the Logische Untersuchungen‘s relation to the Ideen. The latter, we propose, is a response to the failure of the Logische Untersuchungen‘s ontology. It can thus be understood in terms of a shift in the ontology of the Logische Untersuchungen, a shift motivated by the attempt to overcome the contradictory assertions of the Logische Untersuchungen. In this sense our thesis is that, in the technical meaning that Husserl gives the term, the Logische Untersuchungen and the Ideen can be linked via a "motivated path. " We can, by way of an introduction, clarify our theses by regard ing three elements. The first is the relation of epistemology to ontology. The second is the notion of motivation as Husserl conceives the term. The third is the fundamental distinctions that are to be explained via the notion of motivation. 1. We should begin by remarking that the goal of the Logische Untersuchungen is explicitly epistemo | 出版日期 | Book 1981 | 关键词 | Edmund Husserl; epistemology; intention; knowledge; nature; objectivity; ontology; relativism; scepticism; su | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3446-2 | isbn_softcover | 978-90-481-8264-0 | isbn_ebook | 978-94-017-3446-2Series ISSN 0079-1350 Series E-ISSN 2215-0331 | issn_series | 0079-1350 | copyright | Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1981 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|