找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: The Process of Science; Contemporary Philoso Nancy J. Nersessian Book 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987 objectivity.philosop

[复制链接]
查看: 19203|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:19:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称The Process of Science
副标题Contemporary Philoso
编辑Nancy J. Nersessian
视频video
丛书名称Science and Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: The Process of Science; Contemporary Philoso Nancy J. Nersessian Book 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987 objectivity.philosop
描述For some time now the philosophy of science has been undergoing a major transfor­ mation. It began when the ‘received view‘ of scientific knowledge -that developed by logical positivists and their intellectual descendants - was challenged as bearing little resemblance to and having little relevance for the understanding of real science. Subsequently, an overwhelming amount of criticism has been added. One would be hard-pressed to find anyone who would support the ‘received view‘ today. Yet, in the search for a new analysis of scientific knowledge, this view continues to exert influence over the tenor of much of present-day philosophy of science; in particular, over its problems and its methods of analysis. There has, however, emerged an area within the discipline - called by some the ‘new philosophy of science‘ - that has been engaged in transforming the problems and methods of philosophy of science. While there is far from a consensus of beliefs in this area, most of the following contentions would be affirmed by those working in it: - that science is an open-ended, on-going activity, whose character has changed significantly during its history - that science is not a monolithic e
出版日期Book 1987
关键词objectivity; philosophy of science; realism; science; scientific practice
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8
isbn_softcover978-94-010-8072-9
isbn_ebook978-94-009-3519-8Series ISSN 0924-4697
issn_series 0924-4697
copyrightMartinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987
The information of publication is updating

书目名称The Process of Science影响因子(影响力)




书目名称The Process of Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称The Process of Science网络公开度




书目名称The Process of Science网络公开度学科排名




书目名称The Process of Science被引频次




书目名称The Process of Science被引频次学科排名




书目名称The Process of Science年度引用




书目名称The Process of Science年度引用学科排名




书目名称The Process of Science读者反馈




书目名称The Process of Science读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:51:01 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8objectivity; philosophy of science; realism; science; scientific practice
发表于 2025-3-22 01:07:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:07:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:55:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:58:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:00:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:16:53 | 显示全部楼层
0924-4697 owledge -that developed by logical positivists and their intellectual descendants - was challenged as bearing little resemblance to and having little relevance for the understanding of real science. Subsequently, an overwhelming amount of criticism has been added. One would be hard-pressed to find a
发表于 2025-3-23 02:11:52 | 显示全部楼层
9楼
发表于 2025-3-23 05:40:30 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-18 14:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表