找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: The Biotechnology Debate; Democracy in the Fac Bernice Bovenkerk Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Animal biotechnology.B

[复制链接]
查看: 51726|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 19:56:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称The Biotechnology Debate
副标题Democracy in the Fac
编辑Bernice Bovenkerk
视频video
概述Bridges the gap between theory and practice, whereas previous books have focussed only on deliberative theory or the practice of public deliberation.Not only relevant for academic scholars, but also f
丛书名称Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: The Biotechnology Debate; Democracy in the Fac Bernice Bovenkerk Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Animal biotechnology.B
描述.This book grounds deliberative democratic theory in a more refined understanding of deliberative practice, in particular when dealing with intractable moral disagreement regarding novel technologies. While there is an ongoing, vibrant debate about the theoretical merits of deliberative democracy on the one hand, and more recently, empirical studies of specific deliberative exercises have been carried out, these two discussions fail to speak to one another. .Debates about animal and plant biotechnology are examined as a paradigmatic case for intractable disagreement in today’s pluralistic societies. This examination reveals that the disagreements in this debate are multi-faceted and multi-dimensional and can often be traced to fundamental disagreements about values or worldviews. .“One of the acute insights to emerge from this examination is that deliberation can serve different purposes vis-à-vis different types of problem.  In the case of deeply unstructured problems, like the modern biotechnology debate, the aim of inclusion is more appropriate than the aim of consensus. This book highlights the importance of political culture and broader institutional settings in shaping the ca
出版日期Book 2012
关键词Animal biotechnology; Biotechnology debate; Consensus conferences; Deliberative democratic theory; Novel
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2691-8
isbn_softcover978-94-007-9215-9
isbn_ebook978-94-007-2691-8Series ISSN 1387-6678 Series E-ISSN 2215-0323
issn_series 1387-6678
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
The information of publication is updating

书目名称The Biotechnology Debate影响因子(影响力)




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate网络公开度




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate网络公开度学科排名




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate被引频次




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate被引频次学科排名




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate年度引用




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate年度引用学科排名




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate读者反馈




书目名称The Biotechnology Debate读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:37:39 | 显示全部楼层
第105232主题贴--第2楼 (沙发)
发表于 2025-3-22 04:11:57 | 显示全部楼层
板凳
发表于 2025-3-22 08:15:46 | 显示全部楼层
第4楼
发表于 2025-3-22 12:47:07 | 显示全部楼层
5楼
发表于 2025-3-22 14:22:33 | 显示全部楼层
6楼
发表于 2025-3-22 19:24:52 | 显示全部楼层
7楼
发表于 2025-3-22 23:28:47 | 显示全部楼层
8楼
发表于 2025-3-23 03:50:06 | 显示全部楼层
9楼
发表于 2025-3-23 06:05:29 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 02:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表