找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture; Medicine, Knowledge Monika Pietrzak-Franger Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[复制链接]
楼主: 粗略
发表于 2025-3-23 10:14:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:43:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:54:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:53:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 05:30:56 | 显示全部楼层
Aetiology and Etymology: Concepts, Bodies, Media,sic tenets of the expert knowledge about syphilis at the .. Secondly, against the background of recent interdisciplinary debates about illness, it argues for the necessity of discussing syphilis concepts with reference to the materiality of the disease, its media evocations and the concomitant rheto
发表于 2025-3-24 07:56:17 | 显示全部楼层
Recognizing Syphilis: Pornographic Knowledge and the Politics of Explanation,llowed to see and talk about syphilis, under what circumstances and how such acts were justified. How was the spectacle of syphilis framed and what political considerations accompanied the display of the disease? A discussion of medical publications, domestic medicine manuals, specialist and public
发表于 2025-3-24 10:51:57 | 显示全部楼层
Facing Pathology: Modern (Re)Production of Difference,such visualizations? It claims that in the late nineteenth century a new alliance between syphilis and consumption was forged in popular imagination and in scientific parlance. As a result of this fusion, a shift took place in the medical writing from the semantics of a syphilitic body to the syntax
发表于 2025-3-24 15:31:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 20:32:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 00:23:14 | 显示全部楼层
,Conclusion: “Uncomforable Proximity” and the Ethics of Display,critical revisions can be regarded as adequate instruments in the rethinking of this issue. By contending that both critical and creative reconsiderations of syphilis’s semantics have themselves been prone to binary thinking, it calls for a more ethical engagement with Victorian culture.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-12 14:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表