找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning; Benny Carlson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde

[复制链接]
查看: 46862|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 20:07:25 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning
编辑Benny Carlson
视频video
概述Surveys the debate on economic planning among Swedish economists in the 1930s.Summarises the international debate on economic planning, with figures such as Mises and Hayek.Explores reasons behind a n
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in Economic History
图书封面Titlebook: Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning;  Benny Carlson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde
描述.The 1930s, characterised by repercussions from World War I and the Great Depression, was an era of populism, nationalism, protectionism, government intervention and attempts to create planned economies. The perceived need for economic planning emerged in Sweden in part due to the increasing political strength of the Social Democrats and their evolution from a party hampered by Marxist fatalism to a pragmatic mass movement. The Swedish debate continued beyond World War II and is still relevant to today’s economic crises, which have resulted in a demand for action coming from below (populism) and above (elitism)..Carlson surveys the arguments for and against economic planning as they were put forward by leading Swedish economists in the 1930s, with a focus on the thoughts of Gustav Cassel, Eli Heckscher, Gösta Bagge, Gunnar Myrdal and Bertil Ohlin, among others. In so doing he provides a timely exploration of the debate on the necessary and desirable extentof state intervention in market economies..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Swedish economic history; Economic planning; Gustav Cassel; Eli Heckscher; Gösta Bagge; Gunnar Myrdal; Ber
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03700-0
isbn_ebook978-3-030-03700-0Series ISSN 2662-6497 Series E-ISSN 2662-6500
issn_series 2662-6497
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning网络公开度




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning被引频次




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning被引频次学科排名




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning年度引用




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning年度引用学科排名




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning读者反馈




书目名称Swedish Economists in the 1930s Debate on Economic Planning读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:38:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:40:39 | 显示全部楼层
2662-6497 figures such as Mises and Hayek.Explores reasons behind a n.The 1930s, characterised by repercussions from World War I and the Great Depression, was an era of populism, nationalism, protectionism, government intervention and attempts to create planned economies. The perceived need for economic plan
发表于 2025-3-22 07:52:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:40:54 | 显示全部楼层
The International Context,ates. The British case was complex; planning was “a word that was on everyone’s lips and yet fractured by a multitude of interpretations and meanings”. Planning ambitions in the US made an imprint around the world when Franklin Roosevelt in the spring of 1933 launched his New Deal. In both countries
发表于 2025-3-22 14:33:27 | 显示全部楼层
The Swedish Economists,r generation of classical/market liberals opposed to planning, Bertil Ohlin and Gunnar Myrdal a younger generation of social liberals or socialists advocating planning. These five fought over economic planning from the late 1920s to the late 1930s. Cassel, Heckscher and Ohlin wrote in daily newspape
发表于 2025-3-22 20:21:18 | 显示全部楼层
Economists in the Swedish Debate,nservative government introduced a “milling obligation” which Eli Heckscher branded as “economic planning with no plan”, after the pattern of Soviet Russia. The New Deal caught the attention in mid-1933 and was particularly scrutinized by Bertil Ohlin. In early 1934, when the Social Democrats reveal
发表于 2025-3-22 23:12:11 | 显示全部楼层
Summary and Conclusions,ons are addressed: Which were the main foreign sources of inspiration? Swedish economists seldom referred to any sources of inspiration. Bertil Ohlin was the exception and his sources were mainly British. How did the economists affect Swedish economic policy? Gustav Cassel, Eli Heckscher and Ohlin e
发表于 2025-3-23 02:15:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:10:43 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 06:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表