找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Susan Haack: Reintegrating Philosophy; Julia F. Göhner,Eva-Maria Jung Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc

[复制链接]
楼主: 厌倦了我
发表于 2025-3-25 06:27:07 | 显示全部楼层
Problems at the Basis of Susan Haack’s Foundherentismermediate position between foundationalism and coherentism that leads to a solution of well-known problems these standard accounts face. In our paper, we discuss Haack’s foundherentism and argue that it shares an important trait with foundationalism, a trait that is at the core of one of the biggest
发表于 2025-3-25 08:35:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:01:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 17:45:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 22:29:22 | 显示全部楼层
Lessons in Multiculturalism and Objectivity? Puzzling Out Susan Haack’s Philosophy of Educationenhance students’ ability to discern (non-)conventional elements within their belief systems, and to examine their convictions critically. In our paper, we pursue two objectives: first, we interpret Haack as implicitly adopting critical thinking as a crucial educational aim. Second, we expose a fund
发表于 2025-3-26 03:19:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 06:55:29 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluating Philosophy: Susan Haack’s Contribution to Academic Ethicsuct Haack’s critique of what she calls “preposterism” in academia. ., we focus on the measurement of academic quality of philosophical work, scholars, or institutions through surrogate measures. We try to show that a total refusal of surrogate measures in academia is no solution, but that using thes
发表于 2025-3-26 09:26:09 | 显示全部楼层
The Role of Experience in Empirical Justification: Response to Nikolai Ruppert, Riske Schlüter, and , outside, among scientists, legal scholars, historians, etc. I was especially glad that so many of these readers had found my ideas helpful in their fields. But somehow I wasn’t greatly surprised that—despite Hilary Putnam’s comment on the back cover that Popper, Quine, Rorty, Goldman, the Churchla
发表于 2025-3-26 14:54:02 | 显示全部楼层
The Real, the Fictional, and the Somewhere-in-Between: Response to Julia Friederike Göhner, Tim Grafrfeldt focus—ideas about fictional characters, and specifically about the fictionalized versions of real people, places, etc., that sometimes turn up in works of fiction—are only a kind of codicil to the central themes of the much more comprehensive metaphysical theory I call Innocent Realism; and t
发表于 2025-3-26 20:35:30 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-3 21:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表