Titlebook: Surgical Versus Conservative Treatment of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations; A Study in Surgical Luigi Pellettieri Book 1980 Spring

极小量

pineal-gland

热情赞扬

HARD

Morphological Aspects,ients with AVM and define adequate criteria for selection of the most suitable mode of therapy—surgery or conservative treatment. A prerequisite for the study was that comparisons of the results of treatment in the two groups were made between patients who were comparable with respect to individual

不知疲倦

The Original Clinical Decision, for selection of patients and surgical technique. Other neurosurgeons argue convincingly in favour of conservative treatment. It seems reasonable to advocate a treatment policy which allows selection of the most suitable therapy in each individual case. In most decision processes certain clinical v

CRAB

CRAB

吗啡

The Decision Process and Assessment of the Prognosis,rated and the nonoperated group. It has previously been reported . that operable patients have a favourable prognosis even without operation and this finding has been used as an argument in support of conservative treatment. Our study has shown that this conclusion is not correct as we found a highe

特别容易碎

General Discussion and Conclusion, exert maximum control over the course of the disease, he assesses not only the relevant facts as they present themselves at that moment but also the likely future course. Each symptom or item of information is thus assigned both spatial and temporal dimensions. Different factors (symptoms or data)

积习难改

The Decision Process and Assessment of the Prognosis, a few patients with congruent risk profiles, where a comparison is possible. Only in one of the three subgroups of measurement there is a significant difference in treatment results in favour of the operated group (p < 0.01), while in the other two there is no difference (see Fig. 28, Chapter V).