找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta; Norman O. Dahl Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

[复制链接]
查看: 40797|回复: 61
发表于 2025-3-21 19:35:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta
编辑Norman O. Dahl
视频video
概述Argues for an interpretation of Z that runs against the current of most contemporary scholarship.Offers a brief indication of the problems that arise in trying to understand Z and what can be done to
图书封面Titlebook: Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta;  Norman O. Dahl Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen
描述.This book argues that according to .Metaphysics .Zeta, substantial forms constitute substantial being in the sensible world, and individual composites make up the basic constituents that possess this kind of being. The study explains why Aristotle provides a reexamination of substance after the .Categories., .Physics., and .De Anima., and highlights the contribution Z is meant to make to the science of being. Norman O. Dahl argues that Z.1-11 leaves both substantial forms and individual composites as candidates for basic constituents, with Z.12 being something that can be set aside. He explains that although the main focus of Z.13-16 is to argue against a Platonic view that takes universals to be basic constituents, some of its arguments commit Aristotle to individual composites as basic constituents, with Z.17’s taking substantial form to constitute substantial being is compatible with that commitment... ..
出版日期Book 2019
关键词aristotle; platonic; ancient thought; Book Zeta; Greek philosophy; metaphysics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22161-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-22163-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-22161-4
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta网络公开度




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta被引频次




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta被引频次学科排名




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta年度引用




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta年度引用学科排名




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta读者反馈




书目名称Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:28:08 | 显示全部楼层
hat arise in trying to understand Z and what can be done to .This book argues that according to .Metaphysics .Zeta, substantial forms constitute substantial being in the sensible world, and individual composites make up the basic constituents that possess this kind of being. The study explains why A
发表于 2025-3-22 04:26:39 | 显示全部楼层
,The Universal as Substance: 1038b8–1039a3—Solutions to the Problems,idual composites basic constituents. Aristotle’s interlocutor thinks his view satisfies Z.13’s . assumption because its universals are essences only of objects immediately below them. Aristotle argues that this is mistaken, and adds two arguments that parallel 1038b8–15 and 1038b15–16.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:52:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:11:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:18:27 | 显示全部楼层
Z.1, Substantial Forms or Individual Composites as Basic Constituents,cept the interpretation that best fits the rest of Z. But until the rest of Z has been investigated, individual composites and substantial forms should each be regarded as candidates for basic constituents.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:04:33 | 显示全部楼层
Z.3, The Rejection of Matter,orm being what is puzzling and needs investigations. Two passages in Z.3 that have been thought to reject individual composites as basic constituents can be seen not to do so. Z.3 leaves substantial forms and individual composites as candidates for basic constituents.
发表于 2025-3-22 21:33:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:24:06 | 显示全部楼层
Z.6 and the Pale Man Argument,e recognizes are fallacious. An investigation of the details of what he says supports taking sameness in the pale man argument to be sameness in formula, and so to leave individual composites as candidates for basic constituents.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:40:08 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-8 06:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表