Titlebook: Sublime Coleridge; The Opus Maximum Murray J. Evans Book 2012 Murray J. Evans 2012 Coleridge.Romanticism.Samuel Taylor Coleridge

irritants

书目名称Sublime Coleridge影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Sublime Coleridge影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Sublime Coleridge网络公开度




书目名称Sublime Coleridge网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Sublime Coleridge被引频次




书目名称Sublime Coleridge被引频次学科排名




书目名称Sublime Coleridge年度引用




书目名称Sublime Coleridge年度引用学科排名




书目名称Sublime Coleridge读者反馈




书目名称Sublime Coleridge读者反馈学科排名

沙草纸

Murray J. Evansr and Manuel). These substrata provide both shelter from predators and a supply of organic detritus and other foodstuffs, with the result that in many riverine communities, amphipod species such as . (Linnaeus) may represent the dominant macroinvertebrate in terms of biomass (Macneil et al. Shaw.

Tincture

 μm screens, respectively. The flotation concentrates are dewatered using pressure filters, and the resultant dehydrated concentrates contain 7.5–8.0% moisture. The annual production of zinc and lead concentrates are 508 and 109 kt, respectively (Kral 1992). Dewatered zinc and lead concentrates prod

不幸的人

Obstreperous

Introduction,th that dream” (2006, 288). Since the . (.) is a part of that lifelong dream for Coleridge, modern readers need not be surprised if the work is, in several ways, challenging to characterize. Philosophical and biographical contexts to help introduce . are not too difficult to come by. But what is the

心胸狭窄

,Reading “Will”: A Primer for the ,,ge defines his first assumption or “postulate” for the whole argument of . as “the Existence of the .” (. 11). To understand Will is a prerequisite for understanding . But the definition of Will at the end of Chapter III is not very clear; and the whole chapter leading up to the definition can be a

宇宙你

,“Divine Ideas” and Coleridge’s Two Rhetorics of “Idea”,sewhere as “God’s . of finite things.” But then he adds: “.—which originate in him but acquire separate existence” (. I 156). That divine ideas are somehow . God but not necessarily . God is not self-evident. This doubleness recurs in other mentions of divine ideas in relation to the Trinity as Tetr

Instinctive

Human Subjects in the ,,theme in two passages. The first comprises the final chapter of VCL MS 29, vol. iii (McFarland’s Fragment 1) and opening chapter of MS 29, vol. ii (Fragment 2). Here (. 57–96), Coleridge presents a revised version of a preexisting text, Coleridge’s “Essay on Faith” (. II 833–44, hereafter .). One im

平常

,Arguing for the Trinity: Rhetoric and the “Divine Tetractys”,s more attention. The conclusion of VCL MS 29, vol. ii (McFarland’s Fragment 2) presents Coleridge’s Idea of the Trinity as “Divine Tetractys”: the Absolute Will self-manifested in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This passage is the fullest development of the theme in the Coleridge canon. Revisiting r

Cleave