找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Studies in British Government; N. H. Brasher Book 1965 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1965 Britain.governm

[复制链接]
楼主: 恰当
发表于 2025-3-25 03:56:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 08:27:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:51:43 | 显示全部楼层
The Supremacy of the Cabinet, the nineteenth century, when it was possible for Bagehot to regard the Cabinet as merely a committee of Parliament, but it is not held to have much relevance to present-day conditions. In . Sir Ivor Jennings writes ‘No change or development of policy of any importance would be carried out without C
发表于 2025-3-25 16:39:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:13:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 02:07:44 | 显示全部楼层
The Redress of Grievances,ms for the citizen. Moreover, the long struggle for supremacy between the monarchy and Parliament in the seventeenth century was based in the first place on the principle that there should be ‘redress of grievances before supply’. In defending its own constitutional rights so zealously Parliament wa
发表于 2025-3-26 05:00:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:09:49 | 显示全部楼层
Voting Systems,more attention than it is sometimes given. The freedom of the voter to use his vote as he chooses, or not at all, is a feature of the system which can be taken for granted. Apart from this, the usual defence of the British method of voting is that it is simple, expedient, and, by and large, fair. Th
发表于 2025-3-26 15:43:04 | 显示全部楼层
The House of Lords,es in the constitution to strike the understanding with full force. To those brought up in Britain familiarity surrounds our apparently curious constitutional habits with a haze, which we seldom attempt to penetrate. A foreigner, unfortified with our mystical certainty in the wisdom of our constitut
发表于 2025-3-26 20:04:48 | 显示全部楼层
Problems in the Administration of Justice, knew that it was a conservative profession, that the procedure of relying on an overworked Lord Chancellor and an understaffed Law Revision Committee for the production of reforms was unsatisfactory, and that the political parties were unlikely to be attracted to making legal reforms of little gene
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-20 00:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表